DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 35.6 points higher (47.0 vs 11.4) but costs 7.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $461; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.4, and DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) when 11.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 47.0 | +312.3% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $3,464.84 | +652.0% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 7.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.20s | 91.96s | +355.2% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 355.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 312.3% more intelligence, 652.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 355.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-5-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-5-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill