DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) scores 22.8 points higher (34.2 vs 11.4) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($768 vs $461; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GPT-5.6 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 34.2 | +200.0% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $767.78 | +66.6% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 66.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.69s | 6.69s | −64.2% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 64.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 200.0% more intelligence, 66.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GPT-5.6 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-5-6-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-5-6-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill