DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GPT-6 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Sol (Low)
GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 200.0% more intelligence, 41.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 34.2 | +200.0% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $268.73 | −41.7% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 41.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.20s | 6.34s | −68.6% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 68.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GPT-6 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-6-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-6-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill