DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) scores 2.1 points higher (11.4 vs 9.3) but costs 9.9× as much to run the benchmark ($461 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 9.3 | −18.4% Mistral Large 3 is 18.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $46.41 | −89.9% Mistral Large 3 is 89.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.16s | 7.23s | −64.1% Mistral Large 3 is 64.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 18.4% less intelligence, 89.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill