DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 41.0 points higher (52.4 vs 11.4) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $461; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.4, and DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) when 11.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 52.4 | +359.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 4.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $5,786.78 | +1156.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.16s | 43.73s | +116.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 116.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 359.6% more intelligence, 1156.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 116.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill