DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Qwen3.5 Omni Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 12.5 | +9.6% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 9.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.43s | 3.89s | −78.9% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 78.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.10 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/qwen3-5-omni-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/qwen3-5-omni-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill