DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) | GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 6.7 | −48.9% GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoni… is 48.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 76.91s | 10.83s | −85.9% GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoni… is 85.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.85 / $2.75 | $0.60 / $1.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/glm-4-5v · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/glm-4-5v?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill