DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Ling-3.0-flash-Fin

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Ling-3.0-flash-Fin. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing-3.0-flash-FinNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)Ling-3.0-flash-FinDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.122.6+72.5% Ling-3.0-flash-Fin is 72.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)76.91sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.85 / $2.75—
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25): what beats itLing-3.0-flash-Fin: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/ling-3-0-flash-fin · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/ling-3-0-flash-fin?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill