DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 46.3 | +253.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $206.66 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 77.71s | 48.29s | −37.9% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 37.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.85 / $2.75 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill