DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 39.8 | +203.8% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $362.72 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 79.77s | 50.52s | −36.7% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 36.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.85 / $2.75 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill