DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 27.3 points higher (37.0 vs 9.7) but costs 172× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $19.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 37.0 | +281.4% GPT-5.5 (High) is 3.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $3,410.76 | +17065.4% GPT-5.5 (High) is 172× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.96s | 19.79s | +299.0% GPT-5.5 (High) is 299.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 281.4% more intelligence, 17065.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 299.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek V3 0324GPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill