DeepSeek V3 0324 vs gpt-oss-120b (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
gpt-oss-120b (High) scores 1.9 points higher (11.6 vs 9.7) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($123 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick gpt-oss-120b (High) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 11.6 | +19.6% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 19.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $122.71 | +517.6% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 6.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.39s | 11.29s | +157.2% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 157.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
gpt-oss-120b (High) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 19.6% more intelligence, 517.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 157.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V3 0324gpt-oss-120b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill