DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Grok 4.3 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (High) scores 15.2 points higher (24.9 vs 9.7) but costs 18× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.3 (High) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Grok 4.3 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 24.9 | +156.7% Grok 4.3 (High) is 2.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $363.24 | +1728.1% Grok 4.3 (High) is 18× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.62s | 27.84s | +502.6% Grok 4.3 (High) is 502.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (High) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 156.7% more intelligence, 1728.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 502.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V3 0324Grok 4.3 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/grok-4-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/grok-4-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill