DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 36.7 points higher (46.4 vs 9.7) but costs 250× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $19.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 46.4 | +378.4% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 4.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $4,967.35 | +24899.2% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 250× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.62s | 40.07s | +767.3% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 767.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 378.4% more intelligence, 24899.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 767.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V3 0324Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill