DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 20.4 points higher (30.1 vs 9.7) but costs 60× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 30.1 | +210.3% Kimi K3 (Low) is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $1,190.42 | +5891.0% Kimi K3 (Low) is 60× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.96s | 66.33s | +1237.3% Kimi K3 (Low) is 1237.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 210.3% more intelligence, 5891.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1237.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 0324Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill