DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 16.8 points higher (26.5 vs 9.7) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $19.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 26.5 | +173.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.42 | $282.51 | +1354.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.44s | 6.33s | +42.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 42.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 173.2% more intelligence, 1354.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V3 0324Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill