DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) vs Muse Ember (Max)

DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning) vs Muse Ember (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
-
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Ember (Max)On the frontier
Intelligence
36.00
Total cost
$117
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)Muse Ember (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)Not reported36.0— not comparable
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$117.12— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.94sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.42 / $1.34$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning): what beats itMuse Ember (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-reasoning/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-reasoning/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill