DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) | GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.8 | 18.5 | +25.0% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 25.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 79.13s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.64 / $2.75 | $0.55 / $2.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus-reasoning/glm-4-6-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus-reasoning/glm-4-6-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill