DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) | GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.9 | 8.4 | −39.6% GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoni… is 39.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.43s | 9.86s | +32.7% GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoni… is 32.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.27 / $1.00 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/glm-4-6v · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/glm-4-6v?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill