DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Minimal)
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Minimal). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5 nano (Minimal) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.9 | 7.1 | −48.9% GPT-5 nano (Minimal) is 48.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.39s | 4.19s | −43.3% GPT-5 nano (Minimal) is 43.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.27 / $1.00 | $0.05 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/gpt-5-nano-minimal · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/gpt-5-nano-minimal?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill