DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)Ling 3.1 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.941.1+195.7% Ling 3.1 Flash is 3.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,014.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)7.45s13.56s+82.0% Ling 3.1 Flash is 82.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.27 / $1.00$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning): what beats itLing 3.1 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill