DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-FlashOn the frontier
Intelligence
37.90
Total cost
$110
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)MiMo-V2.6-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.937.9+172.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.7× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$109.55— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)7.43s49.53s+566.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 566.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.27 / $1.00$0.14 / $0.28
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiMo-V2.6-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill