DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.1Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M2.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.920.9+50.4% MiniMax-M2.1 is 50.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)7.43s44.37s+497.2% MiniMax-M2.1 is 497.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.27 / $1.00$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/minimax-m2-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus/minimax-m2-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill