DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning)
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | Gemma 4 E2B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.7 | 7.8 | −43.1% Gemma 4 E2B (Reasonin… is 43.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.55s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.56 / $1.68 | — | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/gemma-4-e2b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/gemma-4-e2b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill