DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Low)On the frontier
Intelligence
21.50
Total cost
$10.6
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.721.5+56.9% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 56.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$10.63— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.55s6.60s+0.8% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 0.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.56 / $1.68$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill