DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2 1.2B
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs LFM2 1.2B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | LFM2 1.2B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.7 | 4.8 | −65.0% LFM2 1.2B is 65.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.55s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.56 / $1.68 | — | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/lfm2-1-2b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/lfm2-1-2b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill