DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs LongCat 2.0
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs LongCat 2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.7 | 19.1 | +39.4% LongCat 2.0 is 39.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $544.74 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.48s | 35.69s | +450.8% LongCat 2.0 is 450.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.56 / $1.68 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill