DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High)

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Glimmer (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
17.50
Total cost
$146
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Muse Glimmer (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.717.5+27.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 27.7% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$145.77— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.48s24.78s+282.4% Muse Glimmer (High) is 282.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.56 / $1.68$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itMuse Glimmer (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill