DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Pixtral Large

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Pixtral Large. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
MistralPixtral LargeNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Pixtral LargeDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.77.1−48.2% Pixtral Large is 48.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.55sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.56 / $1.68—
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itPixtral Large: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/pixtral-large-2411 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/pixtral-large-2411?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill