DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3-Flash

DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.00
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.3-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.80
Total cost
$306
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.3-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.041.8+161.2% GLM-5.3-Flash is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$305.52— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported39.33s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.28 / $0.42$0.15 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.3-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-2/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-2/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill