DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 15.6 points higher (24.1 vs 8.5) but costs 60× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $25.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 24.1 | +183.5% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $1,524.02 | +5907.2% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 60× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.84s | 115.75s | +877.6% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 877.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 183.5% more intelligence, 5907.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 877.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill