DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Grok 4.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (High) scores 30.3 points higher (38.8 vs 8.5) but costs 49× as much to run the benchmark ($1244 vs $25.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Grok 4.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 38.8 | +356.5% Grok 4.5 (High) is 4.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $1,243.85 | +4802.8% Grok 4.5 (High) is 49× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 18.82s | +58.3% Grok 4.5 (High) is 58.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.5 (High) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 356.5% more intelligence, 4802.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Grok 4.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/grok-4-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/grok-4-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill