DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 31.1 points higher (39.6 vs 8.5) but costs 55× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $25.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 39.6 | +365.9% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 4.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $1,385.40 | +5360.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 55× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.23s | 22.03s | +115.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 115.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 365.9% more intelligence, 5360.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 115.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill