DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 36.6 points higher (45.1 vs 8.5) but costs 65× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $25.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 45.1 | +430.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 5.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $1,655.27 | +6424.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 65× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 29.94s | +151.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 151.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 430.6% more intelligence, 6424.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 151.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill