DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 43.9 points higher (52.4 vs 8.5) but costs 228× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $25.4; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 52.4 | +516.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 6.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $5,786.78 | +22709.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 228× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 41.43s | +248.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 248.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 516.5% more intelligence, 22709.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 248.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill