DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) vs Muse Glimmer (High)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) vs Muse Glimmer (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
28.50
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Glimmer (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
$182
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)Muse Glimmer (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)28.56.3−77.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 77.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$181.95— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.41s21.05s+69.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 69.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High): what beats itMuse Glimmer (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill