DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-02.
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 39.2 points higher (57.7 vs 18.5) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $310; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 57.7 | +211.9% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $5,903.03 | +1802.7% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 19× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.05s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 211.9% more intelligence, 1802.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/gemini-4-carbon-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/gemini-4-carbon-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill