DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.92s | 4.40s | +12.2% Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B is 12.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.04 / $0.07 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill