DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 10.8 points higher (45.1 vs 34.3) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $200; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 34.3 | −23.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 23.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $199.63 | −55.1% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 55.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.22s | 18.12s | +11.7% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 11.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 23.9% less intelligence, 55.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/deepseek-v4-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/deepseek-v4-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill