DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 20.2% less intelligence, 152.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 36.0 | −20.2% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 20.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $1,122.27 | +152.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.12s | 25.88s | +60.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 60.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill