DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 34.1% less intelligence, 335.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 29.7 | −34.1% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 34.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $1,935.39 | +335.3% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 4.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.12s | 25.04s | +55.3% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 55.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill