DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 7.5 | −83.4% Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reas… is 83.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.97s | 11.53s | −27.8% Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reas… is 27.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill