DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 17.6 points higher (45.1 vs 27.5) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $350; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Low).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 27.5 | −39.0% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 39.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $350.36 | −21.2% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 21.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.88s | 5.73s | −63.9% GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is 63.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 39.0% less intelligence, 21.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-5-6-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-5-6-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill