DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs GPT-5 mini (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 28.3 points higher (45.1 vs 16.8) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $189; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5 mini (High).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | GPT-5 mini (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 16.8 | −62.7% GPT-5 mini (High) is 62.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $188.66 | −57.6% GPT-5 mini (High) is 57.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.97s | 58.74s | +267.8% GPT-5 mini (High) is 267.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.25 / $2.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5 mini (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 62.7% less intelligence, 57.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 267.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)GPT-5 mini (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-5-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-5-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill