DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs GPT-6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Max) scores 2.5 points higher (47.6 vs 45.1) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1536 vs $445; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 45.1, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when 45.1 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 47.6 | +5.5% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 5.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $1,535.80 | +245.4% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.97s | 105.71s | +561.9% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 561.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 5.5% more intelligence, 245.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 561.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)GPT-6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill