DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 33.5 points higher (45.1 vs 11.6) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $123; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 11.6 | −74.3% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 74.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $122.71 | −72.4% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 72.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.13s | 11.29s | −30.0% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 30.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
gpt-oss-120b (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 74.3% less intelligence, 72.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)gpt-oss-120b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill