DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Ling-2.6-1T

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Ling-2.6-1T. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
45.10
Total cost
$445
InclusionAILing-2.6-1TNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Ling-2.6-1TDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)45.117.0−62.3% Ling-2.6-1T is 62.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$444.60Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.13sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20$0.30 / $2.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): what beats itLing-2.6-1T: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/ling-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/ling-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill