DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Llama 65B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Llama 65B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
45.10
Total cost
$445
MetaLlama 65BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Llama 65BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)45.15.0−88.9% Llama 65B is 88.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$444.60Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.97sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): what beats itLlama 65B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/llama-65b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/llama-65b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill