DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 36.2 points higher (45.1 vs 8.9) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $63.7; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 8.9 | −80.3% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 80.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $63.74 | −85.7% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 85.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.88s | 10.10s | −36.4% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 36.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 80.3% less intelligence, 85.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 36.4% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill