DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 18.5 | −25.1% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 25.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.82s | 78.56s | +2685.8% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 2685.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.55 / $2.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/glm-4-6-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/glm-4-6-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill